W. Bullokar’s abbreviation of his Grammar for English extracted out of his Grammar at large , for the speedy parsing of English speech, and the easier coming to the knowledge of Grammar for other languages

Document TypeModernised
CodeBullokar
PrinterEdmund Bollifant
Typeprint
Year1586
PlaceLondon
Other editions:
  • semi-diplomatic

William Bullokar to the reader

 

As in mirrors, men do behold

the shapes of things not there

but taken from some substance that

is thereunto set near:

so I, that wish my case should be

weighed of each alright,

desire all with mind to mark

this mirror, here in sight.

A woman that her youth hath spent

and fruitful race doth crave,

whereof God hath given unto her

such as her like would have

and is often bereaved of

her tender-loved one,

wherein she joyed in youthful years,

for which she maketh great money.

And God at length, in elder years,

does bless her womb with fruit,

that she enjoys his gracious gift

granted through her long suit.

She hopeth that she shall have help {A1}

of neighbours, friends and kin

in furthering all good luck to her,

when her travels begin.

Though giggling kit and wanton cat

do little know the pain

that ancient matrons have sore-felt,

before they do attain

to know what is the cark and care

for household and for child,

and matronly to yield some stay

in house, in grange, in field.

Even so, sith I in former years

have travelled with good mind

for my country, from time to time,

as duty doth all bind:

my hope in elder years, at last,

is to receive again

the friendly comfort of good minds,

to quite part of my pain.

The bearing horse, the drawing ox,

the toiling ass also

are cherished for their labour:

why should not man be too?

Sith man for man’s sake born is,

none can so live alone,

that of himself can so provide

that he has need of none. {n. p.}

Some have one gift, some another:

some with the body toil,

some with the mind are exercised,

and God appoints each soil

to bring forth diversly their fruits:

in the barrenest place may grow

most plentiful of the best fruits,

if God will have it so.

None should despise the gifts of God,

wheresoever he it finds:

whoso sets light by bettering things

showeth himself unkind

to him that taketh pains there-in,

and unthankful is to God,

that is the giver of all gifts

and can make good of bad.

But to return to mirrors voice:

the travel I am in

may be compared to the time

in which women begin

to conceive child, and the ten months

before deliverance comes

is like my case, reckoning each month

a year within which sum.

Many a pinching pang I had,

and gripe unto the reins,

which I buried to such as I {A2}

thought would ease that my pains.

I must confess some friends I found

that gave me some relief

with comfortable speech, but yet

they eased not all my grief.

No grief is greater to the mind

than when the scorning train

doth jest and gibe at virtues gifts,

and such as do take pain.

You, for their good, that deserve not

to have so good a thing:

themselves not able to do like,

their minds not so bending.

If tears should fall down from mine eyes,

it were not of childish mind,

sith nearer steps of three score years

than fifty my feet find;

nor yet for faintness of courage,

sith willing mind me led

twice into foreign foes country

under the ensign spread.

Serving two knights right worshipful,

both soldiers of renown,

right skillful in warly affairs

to serve in field or town,

with whom I used such diligence

that they put trust in me, {n. p.}

more than in some of elder years

and higher of degree.

I served also in garrison

with Captain Turner too,

to get knowledge in martial feats

the muster-books can show:

In all which times I studied then,

and since, as earnestly

the soldiers’ art as grammar rule,

and could say now for me:

if credit were given unto me,

a tool in storehouse hidden

may serve as well as others do,

when there is time and need.

When time and leisure gave me leave,

or friend did it require,

I did delight in hawk or hound,

more at my friend’s desire

than altogether for pleasure:

in tillage had I skill,

the young breed the old to feed

with other things not ill.

My mind was bent in all my life

to wish my country well,

long time studying the laws of it,

that civilly do deal,

until I saw through coloured right {n. p.}

good conscience bears small sway,

and reason ranged not in rank,

as I had known the day.

Thus dealing with men divers ways,

seeing the course go wry,

I thought it could, not be ill-thought of

if some men I did try

for speedy learning: that the small

in years, but in degree

greater, might with more ease attain

the best pathway to see

whose needs not such, nor courage base,

to study all for gain,

but to measure both right and wrong,

a travel worth their pain.

A twin this volume is, that has

a fellow of more fame,

who shall in swaddling clothes lie still,

until it takes his name,

form her most-sacred hands that sits

in royal princely seat

and may command both high and low,

the small, the men, the great.

And that the learned now would show

I crave, among the rest,

how many alone for his country

has brought the like to pass: {n. p.}

both for the perfect picturing

of speech, and grammar too,

not leaving out old letter, nor

bringing new shapes for more,

nor altering the sense of words,

nor of sentence the phrase,

but that each volume, time to come,

may be read as it was:

And by my travel English tried,

a perfectly ruled tongue,

conferrable in grammar art,

with any ruled long.

But if I err in my conceit,

or by words give offence,

write me the first, pardon the last,

and with me do dispense:

For as in throws the womankind

is touched in hard travail,

when life with death for mastery strives,

whereby she cannot tell

whom she offends: even so my case

to hers may be compared,

that travel in this weighty work,

wherein if I have erred,

if life do last, I will it mend,

and think no shame at all

to be reformed (for man may hear) {n. p.}

else beast do me call.

The soldier in a hold, besieged,

with famine sore-oppressed,

is driven with force, to make his way,

not pining like a beast,

refusing not imparlance with

his enemy to have,

as his credit and country’s wealth

he may with honour save.

As war is an extremity,

that wrongs force doth procure:

so peace (with honour) is preferred,

before warly pleasure.

Your good acceptance of these pains

will cause me to set hand

to perfecting a Dictionary,

the third strength of this band.

If any good man will proceed,

therein to take some pain,

and that good luck will stretch to quit,

the same good will * again.

 

Finis

{n. p.}

 

--- o ---

 

 

 

W. Bullokar’s abbreviation of his Grammar for English extracted out of his Grammar at large, for the speedy parsing of English speech, and the easier coming to the knowledge of Grammar for other languages

 

Speech may be divided

into one of these

eight parts: to wit,

noun

 

declined

pronoun

verb

 

participle

 

 

undeclined

So that there is no one

word to be uttered in

our speech but it is one

of the eight parts before

mentioned

adverb

conjunction

preposition

interjection

 

The name of anything that may be seen, felt, heard, or understanded is called a noun, as a hand, a house, and eye, God, goodness, hearing, learning: and may the easilier be known from every other part of speech by someone of these articles a, an, or the, set before such word, which may commonly be used before any noun-substantive named alone: but if a substantive being in sentence govern a noun-adjective, the adjective is commonly set between such article and substantive, their preposition {B1} being commonly set before them all (except some time for metre’s sake) as, a man of an excellent wit was called to answer in the great hall before all the wisest officers of the city.

A noun-substantive is a perfect word of itself without any word to be joined with it: as in the words showing before what is called a noun.

A noun-adjective is a word not perfectly understanded except a noun-substantive be joined with it, which substantive is known by the answer “who?” or “what?” made upon the adjective as, good, black, hard, green: who good? God. What black? pitch. What hard? wax. What green? grass.

A noun is either of the singular number or of the plural number.

The singular number speaketh but of one: as, a house, an eye, the truth. The plural number speaketh of more than one: as, houses, eyes, truths. A, an serving to the singular. The serving to both numbers.

Here is to be noted that a is sometimes used with the plural number, being joined with an adjective showing plural number: as, a hundred bullocks, a thousand sheep; or with collectives: as, a dozen spoons. Also we say many a {n. p.} man, many a time, for many men, and many times. A doth some time supply the meaning of the prepositions in, of, about, upon, or on, and is sometimes in composition with words used adverbially, sometimes gerundially. The, is always used demonstratively or relatively; a and an are used appellatively.

A Noun-Substantive may be declined, or at the least used in five cases: to wit, the nominative, the accusative, the gainative, the vocative, and the genitive-proprietary.

Every simple substantive without any addition to the first naming thereof may be called the nominative case, though it be spoken alone by itself, which, being joined with other words in sentence, governeth a verb in number and person, and is commonly set before the verb, or sign of his tense, and answereth to the question, who? or what? made upon the verb or his sign: except a question be asked by the verb, or that the verb be the imperative mood, or that it or there come before the verb or his sign, or that the nominative case be set after this word had where if is to be understanded. And sometimes the verb agrees in number and person with it, though the word following the verb answers to the question who? or what? as, it is {B2} not I, it is thou; it is we, it is not they, the negative not being always set after the verb, or between the verb and the sign of his tense. In all these exceptions the nominative case is set after the verb, or after the sign of his tense.

The accusative case doth generally follow the verb, participle, or gerundial, and answereth to the question whom? or what? made upon the verb, participle, preposition, or gerundial; and is some time used absolutely, that is, not governed of any word, when it showeth measure, space, or time. But the same speech being used gainatively is called the gainative case, and being called or spoken unto is said to be the vocative case: as, how John, Robert giveth Richard a shirt, and Nicolas makes William a coat. In this sentence John is the vocative case, Robert and Nicolas be the nominative case, Richard and William be the gainative case, which may be resolved into the accusative case by the preposition to or for as, how John, Robert gives a shirt to Richard, and Nicolas makes a coat for William. Also, it may be called the gainative case being used in like phrase, though in a signification contrary to gain: as, he brake me a bow, spoiled {n. p.} William a coat, and hurt my father and a horse. So, that the four cases before named be of one voice and figure and sometimes used neither gainatively, nor contrarily: as, he told me the matter, and showed me his mind.

The genitive-proprietary is so called because it gets es, s, or z added to the nominative of both numbers and, having after it another word proper or pertaining to it, called the property, which may be set before such proprietary, if ye resolve this genitive-proprietary with the preposition of as, the masters teaching through wisdom’s guide, and children’s learning through virtue’s help doth quit the parent’s charges resolved thus: the teaching of the master through the guide of wisdom, and learning of children through the help of virtue doth quit the charges of the parent. And if the property be governed of a preposition, such preposition is set before such genitive-proprietary, who, being of the singular number, is commonly equivocated with the nominative plural distinguished thus: es, s, z. But the genitive-proprietary might be better distinguished in figure with is, our voice not disagreeing, e and I in those places being so shortly pronounced.

The nominative case being joined with a {n. p.} participle, and governing no verb, nor governed of a verb, may be called the nominative case absolute: as measure, space, or time may be used in the accusative case absolutely also as, they were ten days riding a hundred miles, we tarrying still at London, and not looking one foot without the walls. Such nominative absolute may govern the verb, when such participle is resolved by his verb, having before it one of these conjunctions: when, whilst, if, so-that, or such like, as, they were ten days riding a hundred miles, whilst we tarried still at London, and looked not one foot without the walls.

The case called ablative in Latin or other languages is in English the accusative, though governed of a preposition signifying ablatively.

To decline a noun-substantive remember the two numbers and the five cases before going: to wit, that the accusative, the genitive, and the vocative be like their nominative in both numbers, noting the additions es, s, or z (rather is) to form the nominative plural according to the letter ending the nominative singular. That is, to c’, ch, g, x, s, ss, or sh add es; to b, c, k, d, f, g, h, p, t, th, th̹, v, or wh add s; to l, m, n, r, vowel, half vowel, or diphthong {n. p.} add z. Change f always into vz. The genitive plural is formed of the nominative plural being changed in figure: and it were not amiss if the genitive plural were generally formed of the nominative plural, though our speech seldom hath es, s, or z added to the former ending in es, s, or z being a formative itself. For example, thus:

 

Singularly

babe

 

 

genitive

babes

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

bake

bakes

rod

rods

roof

roofs

rag

rags

 

Plurally

babes

 

 

genitive

babeses

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

bakes

bakeses

rods

rodses

roofs

roofses

rags

ragses

 

Singularly

grace

 

 

genitive

graces

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

match

matches

bridge

bridges

box

boxes

rose

roses

 

{n. p.}

 

Plurally

graces

 

 

genitive

graceses

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

matches

matcheses

bridges

bridgeses

boxes

boxeses

roses

roseses

 

Singularly

bull

 

 

genitive

bulls

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

ram

rams

pan

pans

bar

bars

trouble

troubles

 

Plurally

bulls

 

 

genitive

bullses

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

rams

ramses

pans

panses

bars

barses

troubles

troubleses

 

Singularly

worm

 

 

genitive

worms

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

barn

barns

sceptre

sceptres

way

ways

straw

straws

 

Plurally

worms

 

 

genitive

wormses

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

barns

barnses

sceptres

sceptreses

ways

wayses

straws

strawses

 

{n. p.}

 

Singularly

staff

 

 

genitive

stavs

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

leaf

leavs

beef

beevs

wife

wives

loaf

loaves

 

 

Plurally

stavs

 

 

genitive

stavses

nominative

accusative

gainative and

vocative

leavs

leaveses

bevs

bevses

wivs

wiveses

loavs

loaveses

 

Note that, in the declining of these examples and other words, our voice doth seldom use, ez, added to the nominative-plural, being itself formed by es, s, or z added to the simple: yet I have thus figured it for distinctions sake, where é may well be left out therein, and also in the genitive singular the simple ending in s, and specially to defalk a syllable in verse, and then figured thus: ss, sz, as, Midass earss length was more wondered at than twenty bullss hornss shortness, or a hundred horss ears cropped to their headss nape. For plainer show resolved thus: The length of the ears of Midas was more wondered at than the shortness of the horns of twenty bulls, or the ears of a hundred horses cropped to the nape of their heads. {C1}

Note also that some substantives change voice and figure in the nominative plural: as, of man comes men, of penny comes pence; and some few have one voice and figure in both numbers: as, a sheep, and two sheep; people, folk, swine, cattle, fowl, deer are used in both numbers, and most collectives and massatives, and some ending in x or z, form the plural by adding n: as, of ox, oxen; of hose, hoses and hosen, easily known to the English nation. The doubtful stranger may follow general rule, whose meaning we understand, as well as we know him a stranger thereby in changed declinations.

As touching genders of a noun, we have little need of distinguishing of them, in respect of governing of an adjective or participle who are undeclined; but in respect that a substantive meaneth the male or the female, or neither of them, and some time meaneth both male and female, all which are signified by these pronouns: he, she, it, they, used sometimes demonstratively, sometimes relatively. You must note that the male more properly requireth he and is called the masculine gender; the female requireth she and is called the feminine gender; and meaning neither male nor female requireth it and is called the neuter gender. But meaning both {n. p.} male and female requireth sometimes he, sometimes she, and may be called the double gender, sometimes made manifest by the expressing of he or she according to the substantive showed, or antecedent rehearsed by any of them, it being more properly applied to a thing not having life. It being used demonstratively is accented thus , being properly of the neuter gender singular number and third person, yet some time used in showing other gender, number, and person: as, it is I, it is not thou, it is they, it is not we that must do it. Also when the gender is doubtful, as in speaking of a swine, a fowl, and such like, we use more properly it who, showing the nominative-case of plural number and third person set after the verb-substantive, may suffer such verb to be used in the plural number: as, it be men, it be horses, or it be swine that lay there. An adjective or a participle in respect of his substantive may be said any of these genders, and therefore called the common gender, so is of cases and numbers in an adjective or participle, and the sooner because of conference with other languages that decline adjectives and participles. {C2}

 

 

Singular

nominative

 

 

he

she

it

 

accusative

gainative

him

her

it

 

vocative

and genitive lack

 

 

 

 

Plural

nominative

they

accusative

gainative

them

 

Singular and plural in all genders

nominative

who

which

or that

 

genitive

whose

or

which

 

Accusative

gainative

whom,

which

or that

 

vocatives lack

 

 

Singular

and plural

nominative

masculine

feminine and

double gender

who

which

what

 

 

genitive

 

whose

which

what

 

 

neuter and

doubtful gender

which

what

 

Accusative

gainative

whom

which

what

vocatives lack, except it be in

such phrase: Who are thou?

What be you?

 

Note that who, whose, and whom more fitly serve to the signifying of mankind, also whoses, who might be figured for distinction of the plural.

Other Adjectives are undeclined: except they be used as a substantive or have their substantive understanded and not expressed with {n. p.} them, and then follow the declining of a substantive according to the ending letter as before is showed to decline a substantive: as in this sentence, the wisests purpose is to avoid the evils company, and to follow the godlys advice.

Adjectives whose signification and meaning may be increased or diminished may form comparison and there be three degrees of comparison: to wit, the positive, the comparative, and the superlative.

The positive betokeneth the thing absolutely without excess: to wit, not increased nor diminished in signification, as, hard, gentle, warm, slow. The comparative somewhat exceedeth his positive in signification and is formed of his positive by adding er: as, harder, gentler, warmer, slower. The superlative exceeding his positive in the highest degree and formed of his positive by adding est: as, hardest, gentlest, warmest, slowest.

A few adjectives form comparison by changing voice: as, of good cometh better and best; of ill and evil, worse and worst; of little, less and least; of much, more and most; of many comes more, and so of few others. We use sometimes the worser and the lesser comparatively, {n. p.} the comparative being more properly used in comparing of two together, the superlative used in comparing of more, though we English use the superlative also when we compare but two things together.

The comparative is sometimes formed by setting more in composition before the positive, and the superlative likewise by compounding it with most: as, of bold, more bold, and most bold. And sometimes by better and best (taken in good part) or increased, and by worse and worst (taken in ill part) or diminished, set in composition with the positive: as, of learned, better-learned, and best-learned; of able, worse-able, and worst-able, these more and most being compounded mostly with participles of the preter tense.

An adjective exceeding in signification about measure without any comparison is often used with these compositions, too or over: as, too hard or over hard, too gentle or over gentle; also we say too too hard and over much hard, that is, hard about measure.

Two adjectives coming together in sentence – the one increasing, diminishing, or strongly affirming the signification of the other – may be used in composition: as, full-bold, grievous-sick. {n. p.} Likewise, an adjective may be compounded sometimes with an adverb or adverbial of quality or other: as, well-learned, well-beloved, much-desirous, very-good, right-glad. And sometimes an adjective is used adverbially mostly qualitatively and sometimes quantitively: as, speak soft I pray you, I love you much.

You must note that every word is one of these six figures: to wit, a primitive or a derivative, a single or a compositive, a simple or a declinative. It is called a primitive when it hath signification and meaning of itself: as, a man, a stone, a hand, hard, fat, lean; who have these derivatives (with other): to wit, manhood, stony, handful, harder, fatling, leanness, taking their several significations of those same primitives, and having under the first letter of their addition this derivative prick (.) and then called perfect derivatives: but, being changed in voice – as, of England, English; of France, French; of broad, breadth; of long, length – may be called as derivatives or rather consanguinatives with such primitives. It is called a single, when it is not compounded with any syllable or syllables: as with un-, dis-, mis-, too-, les-, very-, even-, -soever, and such like. Or that two words be compounded with this compositive strike (-) {n. p.} and then called a compositive: as man-kind, hard-headed. This last called a compounded derivative.

The nominative case of a noun or pronoun and the infinitive mood of a verb is called the simple of such part of speech, which, being declined into another voice, is called a declinative, and being a noun hath his declinative strike (‘) over the first letter of the addition to his simple, or known by this s called s declinative. But in every verb, the declinative strike is set under the first letter of the addition. And, if the declinative be changed in voice from his simple, then the declinative strike is set to the first letter of such voice changed: as, of to see, I saw; of man, men. But if the first letter be such with top or foot that it cannot bear such declinative strike, then may you set that strike to the next letter that may bear that strike: as, of louse, lice; of to give, I gave. So that it may well be said, where there is a derivative or declinative by addition, there is also, a former, and a Formative.

Note that some one word hath divers significations or meanings, yet all of one part of speech: as, a bill (for war), a bill (of debt), a bill (of a bird); also to heal (or to make whole) and to {n. p.} heel (or to cover with clothes, etc.) such word is called an equivocate. But if such word of divers meanings may be used in divers parts of speech, or in particular parts of anyone part of speech, it may be called an equivocal: as of the word but we say I shoot at a butt, but I missed the mark, because a sheep did butt me. The first butt being a noun-substantive, the second but being a conjunction, the third butt being a verb. A noun-substantive may easily be known by setting a, an, or the before it. A noun-adjective is known by a substantive joined unto it, which is known by asking the question who? or what? For, without a substantive expressed or understanded, the adjective hath no perfect signification. There are but sixteen pronouns beside their compositives. A verb is easily known by his simple, used with his sign or preposition to and more fully by declining it with the three persons in both numbers: as, to love, whereof is declined, I love, thou lovest, he loveth, we love, you love, they love, etc. A participle is easily known being always derived of a verb, and ending in ing or in ed, d, t, n, or ṇ́, having the derivative prick under the addition to the verb, or under the first letter being changed in figure. Also, being a participle, it requireth {G 1} a substantive or antecedent as an adjective doth.

An Adverb is known from the fewer parts before-going, for that it cannot be in the vice of any of them, but dependeth on some verb, and joineth some special signification to the verb, and is not ruled of any word, neither ruleth any word. As a preposition doth always govern an accusative case otherwise such speech is an adverb. These both being known from a conjunction whoever joineth words, sentences or clauses of sentences together, and being a copulative or disjunctive or any of these three than, but, beside, couple like moods, tenses, and cases as well as sentences and clauses.

An Interjection is easily known, for every word or clause of sentence being suddenly spoken with a sudden passion of the mind under an unperfect voice (which is in effect unparsable) is called an interjection. Which several parts of speech be some time distinguished by figure as by these three grammar notes (.) (-) (‘) and might be amply distinguished by divers pairs of letters, and doubling of some consonant, and the better if a perfect Dictionary were made accordingly for our speech. For the first and chief point in grammar for English is to know what part of speech every word in every sentence {n. p.} is and there in to beware of equivocy, sometimes perceived only by other words in the sentence and when divers words serve for one meaning: as to leak, to fancy, to favour, such may be called co-significatives.

A Pronoun is a part of speech much like a noun and used in showing or rehearsing. There be sixteen pronouns: to wit, I, thou, he, she, it, this, that, same, self, my or mine, thy or thine, his, her, their, our, your. To these may be added who, which and that (for which), relatives before showed in a noun, with the declinatives and compositives of these: as, the self-same, my-self, I-my-self, mine-own-self, I-mine-own-self, and so of the second person, and in both these persons the plural being our and your joined with selves; the third person compounding rather with the primitive of the accusative case than with the derivative: as, him-self, or his-self, etc, all these compounded with self, showing the person. But own compounded with possessive, as mine-own, showeth the proper possession. When any pronoun showeth a thing not spoken-of before, it is called a demonstrative and rehearsing a thing spoken-of is called a relative, and declined as followeth:{G 2}

 

Singularly

nominative

I

accusative

me

gainative

 

Plurally

 

 

 

 

nominative

we

accusative

gainative

us

vocative

lacks

 

Singularly

nominative

and vocative

thou

ye, or

you

accusative

gainative

the

or

you

 

Plurally

 

 

 

nominative

and vocative

ye

or

you

accusative

gainative

 

you

 

He, she, it, also who, which, and that relatives be declined as before in a noun.

All these except who lack their genitive proprietary signified by their derived possessives: my and mine derived of I; thy and thine of thou; his of he and of it; her of she; their of they; our of we; your of ye, or you.

The possessives before showed be undeclined, yet may be said to be governed in case, gender, and number by their substantive proprietary: saving we say sometimes hers, theirs, ours, yours, used proprietarily without any substantive expressed, also mine and thine likewise; at other times, mine and thine are used only before a substantive beginning with a vowel: as, mine {n. p.} host, thine eye; my and mine only used in the vocative case.

 

Singular

 

Plural

 

Singular

 

nominative

accusative

gainative

and genitive

 

 

this

In all

the cases

before

 

 

these

nominative

accusative

gainative

and genitive

 

 

that

 

Plurally

 

 

In all cases

before

those

vocatives lack in all

 

Self and same be undeclined used commonly with this article, the, used also sometimes before which, a relative. Self hath plurally selves, in composition to show the persons as is aforesaid.

A pronoun hath three persons: the first person speaketh of himself as, I, we. The Second is spoken-to as, thou, ye, or you, and therefore every vocative case is the second person. The third person is spoken-of as, he, she, it, they, and therefore all nouns and pronouns, being substantives, be of the third person except I, we, thou, ye, you, and every vocative case.

Adjectives and participles take their person, case, gender, and number of their substantives. The relatives who, which, and that taking their person, the {n. p.} gender and number also of their antecedent, but ruled in case by the verb, or other word in the sentence, other relatives being ruled in case as a noun-substantive or governed of a substantive.

A Verb is a part of speech declined with mood, tense, number, and person. It is called a verb active, when it signifieth to do: as, I love, I teach, and hath a participle of the passive voice derived of it: as, loved, taught; which participle, being joined with the verb substantive to be, taketh his mood or manner of suffering, and his tense also, of the verb substantive, and his case, gender, number, and person, of his ruling substantive: as, I am loved, be thou loved, O-that he were loved, would-God we had been loved, if they have been loved, when we shall be loved, etc. And having no participle passive is called a verb neuter, whose participial is joined with the verb substantive in being only: as, I being run to the town, my father came home. More is said of a participle in the title there of.

To have may be called a verb possessive and his compound, to have rather, a verb choicative. All other verbs are called verbs neuters {n. p.} unperfect, because they require the infinitive mood of another verb to express their signification or meaning perfectly and be these: may, can, might or mought, could, would, should, must, ought, and sometimes will, shall being a mere sign of the future tense. There be five moods: the indicative, the imperative, the optative, the subjunctive, and the infinitive.

The indicative mood showeth a reason true or false (as, I love) or else asketh a question (as, lovest thou?)

The imperative biddeth or commandeth: as, love thou, love ye.

The optative, or wishing mood, wisheth or desireth, and hath always an adverb of wishing joined before his nominative case: as, pray God, I love, I pray God, thou love; God grant, he loves. Also these: I would, would, would-God, would-to-God, O-that, and O-if, be adverbs of wishing showing the optative mood.

The subjunctive mood hath evermore a conjunction set before his nominative case, and dependeth upon another verb in the same sentence, either going before or coming after it: as, the master will be angry, if we be idle; when we use diligence, we learn. {n. p.}

The Infinitive hath neither number, nor person, nor nominative case before it, and is known commonly by this sign or preposition to, which to is not expressed many times when there cometh an accusative case between the infinitive mood and the verb before going: as, bid him come hither. With some verbs we use a like phrase in the nominative case: as, you say I am idle, that being a resolver of the first, and understanded in the last: as, bid that he come hither, you say that I am idle. Neither do we use to after a verb neuter unperfect, except after ought: as, we ought to go thither.

There be three times called tenses: the time that is now, called the present tense (as, I love); the time past, called the preter tense (as, I loved); the time to come, called the future tense (as, I shall or will love).

Time past hath three divisions: the first called the preter tense (as, I loved), sometimes having the sign or preposition did or didst joined with the simple: as, I did love, thou didst love. The second, being perfectly past called the preter-perfect tense, having always the sign or preposition have, hast, or hath set before it: as, I have loved, thou hast loved, he hath loved. The third being more than perfectly past, having {n. p.} always the sign or preposition had or hadst before it, and called the preter-plu-perfect tense: as, I had loved, thou hadst loved, he had loved. There is also a doubtful-preter, and a doubtful-future tense, known by some adverb, or words in the sentence showing the time and as may appear by the declining of the verbs following:

There be in effect but three conjugations or declinings of English verbs: the first is of verbs active and verbs neuter, the second of the verb substantive, the third of neuters unperfect. The verbs to have and to do have their special declinings, as appeareth following:

 

Verbs of the first conjugation are thus declined.

Indicative mood present tense singular

 

I love

 

plural

we

 

love

thou lovest

ye, or you

he loveth

they

 

Or thus

 

I do

 

love

we

 

do love

thou dost

ye, or you

he doth

they

 

{D1}

 

Preter-

tense

singular

I loved

 

plural

we

 

loved

thou lovedst

ye, or

he loved

they

 

Or thus

 

I did

 

love

we

 

did love

thou didst

ye, or

he did

they

 

Preter-

perfect-

tense singular

I have

 

loved

 

plural

we

have

loved

thou hast

ye, or

he hath

they

 

Preter-

plu-perfect

tense singula

I had

 

loved

 

plural

we

had

loved

thou hadst

ye, or

he had

they

 

Future

tense

singular

I shall or will

 

plural

we

shall

or

will

 

love

thou shalt or wilt

ye, or

he shall or will

they

 

The present tense is sometimes used futurely by reason of some adverb or other speech in the sentence showing a time to come as, I ride ten days hence, and my man cometh after me.

 

Imperative mood

 

Present and

doubtful

Future singular

love thou

 

plural

 

love ye, or you

 

Let, a verb impersonal governing an accusative {n. p.} case of the first or third person, may be said to have an imperative signification: as, let me love, let him love, etc.

 

Optative mood

 

Present and

doubtful

future singular

I-pray-God

I

thou

he

we

ye, or

they

 

love

pray-God, or

God grant

 

 

Doubtful-preter

and

doubtful future

I would

 

we

ye, or

they

loved

would

I loved

would-God

thou lovedst

would-to-God,

he loved

or O-that

 

 

Preter

tense

I-pray-God

I loved

we

ye, or you

they

 

loved

pray-God, or

thou lovedst

God grant

he loved

 

Preter-

perfect

tense

I

we

ye, or

they

 

have

loved

The adverbs next before going

being added

thou

he

 

 

Preter-

plu-perfect

tense

I would

 

we

ye, or you

they

had loved

would

I had

would-God

thou hadst

would-to-God

he had

O that, or Oif

 

 

Future-

perfect

tense

I-pray-God

I

we

ye, or

they

 

love hereafter

pray-God, or

thou

God grant

he

 

{D2}

 

This optative mood is sometimes used in the present, and doubtful future tenses in the singular number and third person without any of these adverbs of wishing: as, God save you, God grant them grace, the Lord keep us from evil, good luck be with you.

The subjunctive mood is declined as the indicative every where, having always a conjunction before his nominative case, excepting that after conjunctions, conditionals, exceptives, and adversatives it is declined everywhere in the voice of the optative mood, thus:

 

Subjunctive mood

 

 

when

I love

we

ye, or you

they

 

love

I loved

thou lovest

thou lovedst

he loveth

he loved

 

we

ye, or

they

 

loved or

I did

 

love

I have

 

love etc.

thou didst

thou hast

he did, etc.

he hath

 

I had

 

loved

I shall or will

 

love

thou hadst

thou shalt or wilt

he had, etc.

he shall or will

 

Note that when, used interrogatively or answeratively, is merely an adverb of time.

 

Present and

If, so-that,

I, we

 

love

doubtful

except, unless,

thou, ye, or

future tense

though, although

he, they

 

{n. p.}

 

Doubtful-preter

and doubtful-

future

If, so-that,

I loved

except, unless,

thou lovedst

though, although

he loved

 

we

ye, or

they

 

loved, or did love

 

Preter-tense

declined as

the doubtful

preter next before.

 

Preter-

perfect

tense

If, so-that,

I, we

have

loved

except, unless,

thou, ye, or

though, al-though

he, they

 

Preter-

If, so-that,

I had

 

loved

plu-perfect

except, unless,

thou hadst

tense

though, although

he had

 

we, ye, or they had loved

 

Future-

If, so-that,

I, we

love

here-after.

perfect

except, unless,

thou, ye, or

tense

though, although

he, they

 

This perfect-future may be declined also with shall or will according to their persons.

 

Infinitive mood

 

Present &

doubtful

future tense

 

to love

Preter

tense

to

loved

Preter

perfect

to

have

loved

 

Preter-plu-

perfect tense

to had

loved

future-

perfect

to love

hereafter

 

{n. p.}

 

A Participle of

the present tense

loving

a participle of

the preter-passive

loved

 

A Participle of

the preter active

having loved

 

The second conjugation to decline the verb substantive

 

Indicative mood

 

Present

tense

singular

I am

 

Plural

we

ye, or

they

 

be or are

thou art

he is

 

 

Preter tense

I was

we

ye, or

they

 

were

thou were

he was

 

 

Preter-perfect

I have

we

ye, or

they

 

have been.

thou hast

he hath.

 

 

Preter-plu-perfect

I had

we

ye, or

they

 

have been

thou hadst

he hath

 

Future

tense

I shall or will

we

ye, or

they

shall

or

will

 

be

thou shalt or wilt

he shall or will

 

Imperative mood

 

Present and

doubtful

future tenses

 

be thou

 

be ye, or be you

 

Let governing the first and third person.

 

{n. p.}

 

Optative mood

 

Present and

doubtful

future tense

I-pray-God

I, we

 

be

pray-God, or

thou, ye, or

God grant

he, they

 

Doubtful

preter

and doubtful

future tense

I would

 

 

 

were

would

I, we

would-God

thou, ye, or

would-to-God

he, they

O that, or O if

 

 

 

Preter tense

I-pray-God

I, we

 

were

pray-God, or

thou, ye, or you

God grant

he, they

 

Preter-

perfect

tense

I-pray-God

I, we

 

have been

pray-God, or

thou, ye, or

God grant

he, they

 

 

Preter-

plu-perfect

tense

I would

 

 

 

had been

would

I, we

would-God

thou, ye, or

would-to-God

he, they

O that, or Oif

 

 

Future-

perfect

I-pray-God

I, we

 

be hereafter

pray-God, or

thou, ye, or

God grant

he, they

 

Subjunctive mood

The subjunctive mood is declined like the {n. p.} indicative and the optative, using it according to the conjunctions joined with it, as before is showed in the first conjugation

 

Infinitive mood

 

Present and

Doubtful

Future

 

to be

 

preter

 

to been

preter

perfect

to

have

been

 

Preter-

plu-perfect

tense

 

to had been

future

perfect

 

to be hereafter

 

Participle of the

present tense

 

being

participle

preter

 

having

been

 

 

 

The third conjugation is the declining of verbs-neuters unperfect

 

Verbs Neuters unperfect are undeclined saving they have est added for their second person singular in the present and doubtful future tense, excepting must, in which two tenses only (may and can) of both numbers be used. But might or mought, could, would, should, must, and ought may be used in all moods and both numbers, taking their tense and time of their infinitive significative without the sign or preposition to, have and had being barely thereunto joined in their two {n. p.} tenses. But ought requireth to after it everywhere: as, I can love, thou mightiest loved, he could have loved, we would had loved, you should love hereafter, they must love, they ought to love. More is said in my Grammar at Large touching the equivocy in will, wilt, and would, sometimes showing willingness, sometimes a commandment, sometimes a wishing meant by them. The adverb of wishing (would) is known by having no nominative case.

 

Indicative mood present and doubtful future tense

 

I may, can, will

we

ye, or you

they

may

thou mayst, canst, wilt

can

he may, can, will

will

 

Indicative present and doubtful future

 

I

might, could, would, should, must

 

love etc.

thou

mightest, couldst, wouldst, shouldst, must

he

might, could, would, should, must

 

Preter

loved

future

perfect

tense

 

love hereafter

Preter-perfect

have loved

Preter-plu-perfect

had loved

 

The optative and subjunctive mood be of like voice as before everywhere, their adverbials and conjunction being joined withal.

In like manner is ought, declined by adding {E1} to to his infinitive significative: as, I ought to love, to loved, to have loved, to had loved, to love hereafter, none of these having the imperative mood, nor the infinitive, nor participle.

 

The declinings of the verbs to do and to have, properly called a verb possessive

 

Indicative mood present tense

 

I do

we

ye, or you

they

 

do

preter

tense

I did

thou dost

thou didst

he doth

he did

 

we

ye, or,

they

 

did

The other tenses are declined in all

moods as the first conjugation noting

done to be in all his other preters

 

Indicative mood present tense

 

I have

we

ye, or

they

 

have

And so forth, having

had in all his preters

and declined as the

first conjugation everywhere

thou hast

he hath

 

Note that some verbs change voice in all preter tenses: as, to seek, I sought, I have sought, I had sought, sought, to have sought, having sought; and some change voice but in the first preter of the indicative mood only: as, of to see, I saw, I have seen, I had seen, seen, having seen. Of {n. p.} which a fuller gathering together shall be hereafter made: being in easy vice already for every native English person to be uttered in speech and used in figure.

To have, being compounded with lever, but better compounded with, rather: as, to have-lever, properly called a verb choicative, is declined as his single in all moods and tenses, for all compounded verbs follow the declining of their single, whether the composition be set before or after such single verb.

Have and had, set after a verb neuter unperfect, and governing an accusative case, hath sometimes a special signification or meaning without any possession, as in these phrases: I can have you beaten, we could have him come, they mought have your father beat you, because you would have had me gone with you.

Do, dost, and doth serving to the present tense.

Did and didst serving to the preter tense.

Have, hast, and hath serving to the preter-perfect.

Had and hadst serving to the preter-plu-perfect.

Shall, shalt, will, and wilt serving to the future tense.

These and all verbs neuters unperfect are sometimes used without expressing their verb with them: as, how do you think? As you do. I have learned as you have, though I cannot sing as {E2} you can, and will do as much as ever you could.

The commonest forming of preter tenses is by adding ed to the simple, or d by syncope. But if you leave out e after c, ch, f, k, s, p, ph, x, t, or sh, the d is changed into t: as, to brace, braced and brac’t; of to stretch, stretched or stretcht. If the stranger add ed to every preter, we understand his meaning as well, as we understand him a stranger by it in some words.

Methink of the present tense and methought of the preter tense are impersonals undeclined, not governed nor governing any case. But let used imperatively or permissively governing an accusative case, and commonly an infinitive mood withal, seemeth to have a nominative case of the second person understanded: it skilleth, it behooveth and such like be of the singular number and third person, seeming to be governed of an infinitive mood, sentence or clause of a sentence following: as, me-think it is well, let it alone, and let me go, for it skilleth not whether of us have it, seeing it behooveth us both to look to it.

A participle is a part of speech derived of a verb, from whom it taketh his signification or meaning and, being of the present {n. p.} tense, endeth in ing added to the simple of the verb: as, of to love, loving; of to teach, teaching, and may be used absolutely without any substantive gerundially joined mostly in composition after a preposition: as, in-loving goodness, and by teaching the same, virtue is increased. The same voice is also a noun verbal, either governing a verb, adjective, or relative, or is governed in case, having often times one of the articles (a, an, or the) set before it (or might be) in the sentence. There is also another noun verbal in or, signifying the donor, and another in er, signifying an instrument wherewith a thing is done: as, I hired a trior for the trying of my corn, but he lacketh a trier.

A participle of the preter tense passive hath always a passive or suffering signification formed of the simple of the verb by adding thereunto ed, d, n, ń, or t, and being changed from the figure of his simple hath the derivative prik under the first letter, taking his mood etc. as is before said in a verb active, and formed or figured thus: of to love, loved, or lov’d; of to see, seen; of to know, known; of to teach, taught. Which voice being derived of a verb neuter is used with being, and not passively, and may be called a participial. Both which, being {n. p.} compounded after having, have only an active or doing signification: as, I having loved thee so much, and having taught thee so long, think ill of thee having-gone from me without leave. And, being equivocal also with the simple of his verb is distinguished in figure, thus: I put, I putt, I have putt, I had putt, and the matter is putt into our hands, which doubling of a consonant I have hitherto used only for this distinguishing of the preters from the simple of the verb, or for the shortening of a vowel, which is of long time in the simple or present tense, and of short time in the preters: as, of to hear cometh heard, in the preters of the verb, and heard in the preter of the participle, who are all of one voice (except sometimes the first preter is changed in voice from his simple, as is showed before in a verb). The formative participles are formed by addition according to the letter ending the simple of the verb, more fully handled in the Grammar at Large.

The vice of a participle mostly for shortness of speech, which may be more amply resolved by the verb and the relative that, turnable into which as, a loving man or a man that loveth; a man loved of all men or a man that is loved of all men. And though loved remains a {n. p.} participle in both phrases, yet it may be resolved by his verb active: as, a man that all men love, and by such resolving, and the helps before showed ye may easily know a participle from any other part of speech, though equivocal with other words. Participles or present are compared by er or est, but the preters by more and most, better and best, worse and worst, before showed in a noun. An adverb is a part of speech joined with a verb or participle to declare their signification more expressly by such adverb: as, come hither if thou wilt go forth; sometimes with an adjective: as, thus broad; and sometimes joined with another adverb: as, how soon, as speedily, yet both these depending upon some verb or participle always of an active, passive, or being signification, which ye shall the easilier know to be an adverb by asking the question what? upon it, whereunto a verb, participle or adjective, answereth single or in sentence. But if a substantive answers to the question, be sure that it is a preposition, for an adverb governeth not any case, nor is governed of any word. The negative not is commonly set after the verb or his sign of tense, and before a participle. Most other adverbs {n. p.} are used indifferently before or after verbs, excepting that asking and wishing are used only before the verb, his sign, yea before his nominative case too, so that the voice of a preposition not governing any case is changed into an adverb. The verbs composition separated by not or an accusative case hath this note : as, he left not of to be earnest, the other left of long ago. Their significations appear by the titles following, beginning first with time:

Time: as, now, of late, hereafter, whilst, not yet, never, then, not at all, at last, oft, seldom, henceforth, by and by, long ago, soon, since; and when an interrogative otherwise used conjunctively like whilst, as, today, tomorrow, tonight, as soon as, may be taken substantive-like as well as adverbially.

Place: as, here, there, where, hither, thither, whither, hence, thence, whence, up, down, abroad, back, forth, of, away.

Order: as, moreover, further, furthermore, finally, at last, afterward, thereafter.

Asking: as, how? why? wherefor? whereto?

Affirming, or granting: as, forsooth, ye, yea forsooth, marry, yea marry, yes, yes marry, {n. p.} surely, verily, be it, forbeit.

Denying: or forbidding, as, not, no, no forsooth, no marry.

Teasing on, as, on, on-on, go-to, to it, for to it, rather interjections.

Wishing: as, I pray God, pray God, God grant, would, I would, would God, would to God, O that, O if.

Getting together: as, together, withal, too, and also used last in sentence.

Parting: as, asunder, apart, aside, off,

Choosing: as, rather, yea rather, yea but rather.

A thing not ended: as, scarce, scarcely, scant, scantly, nigh, almost, not yet,

Showing: as, lo.

Chance: as, perhaps, perchance, peradventure, may chance, for it may chance.

Likeness: as, so, thus, as, even as, like as.

Quality: as well, wisely, strongly, mostly formed of an adjective or participle, and sometimes of a substantive also by adding ly (as, namely, manly) or adding a in composition before an adjective (as, abroad, along): or by wise showing likeness (as, hartwise, tablewise, longwise, flatwise, broadwise, otherwise) and most adjectives {E 1} used adverbially and generally all adverbs answering to the question how? sometimes showing likeness.

Quantity, as, enough, altogether, as much, not a whit, much, little, and other answering to the question, how much?

Calling, as, ho, how.

Comparing things together, as, as well, as well as, and other compounded with as, though the later as were singly used or but understanded. For in comparing things together as is twice in the phrase.

There may be some adverbs pertaining to other titles of signification, as, only for excluding or shouting out. And some pertain to divers titles before mentioned, known by their divers significations.

Divers significations forming comparison. Adverbs of quality ending in ly form comparison mostly by adding er and est. The rest by the composition more and most: as, of wisely, wiselier and wiseliest; of hartwise, more hartwise and most hartwise; of abroad, more abroad and most abroad.

The is sometimes used before adverbs and adverbials of the comparative and superlative degree: ye sometimes having of or among partitively: {n. p.} as, the better ye do, the more men will love you, but herein ye did the unwiseliest of them all.

As used comparingly is repeated again: as, he is as good as you, and liveth as well as you. But showing likeness is used alone conjunctively: as, I do as he doth. And sometimes used after the adverb so or adjective such: as, do it so, as praise may come thereof. Also, he is such a man, as I never saw.

So as in composition is a conjunction conditional: as, I will do it, so-as they be content, rather so-that.

Adverbs of place beginning with h, th, wh, being in composition with a preposition, have commonly place, time, cause, occasion, mater, thing, clause, or sentence understanded by such composition, which may be resolved by this, that, which, or what, having such preposition set before them, and one of the significative meanings (before understanded) now expressed. The beginning with h resolved by this; th by that; wh, by which or by what: as, from hence, from thence, from whence. That is, from this place, from that place, from the which place, from what place? Hitherto, thitherto, that is, to this place or time, to that place or time. Also, {E 2} whereunto, or wherefore have ye said this? that is: unto what end or purpose, or for what cause have ye said this? Such composition with for, beginning with th or wh (not interrogatively) is a conjunction used sometimes illatively, sometimes causally. But these compositions are to be handled more at large in a Dictionary.

So, the voice of an adverb joining words, clauses, or sentences together, is a conjunction, but governing any case is a preposition. And these be the three special points to be noted, how to know these three parts of speech asunder: though every voice of these three parts of speech be not expressed in the examples given for them.

Note further that some significations expressed in some language, or languages, by one of by divers parts of speech are in another language expressed by another part or parts of speech: yet all may yield perfect sense or meaning in the language so used. A Conjunction is a part of speech that joineth words, sentences together, whose differing significations appear by their titles following:

Copulatives affirmatively: as, and, also, {n. p.} and-also, eke, and eke, for also, also, both is sometimes used in the beginning before an affirmative copulative adjoining as too is used in ending.

Copulatives negatively: as, nor, neither, nor yet.

Distinctives: as, or, either, or else.

Discretives: as, but.

Causals and illatives: as, because, seeing, sith, since, that demonstratively, for because, seeing that, sith that, since that, for that, for, for why, therefore, and wherefore, mere illatives, and used adjoiningly; the rest, sometimes used pre-joiningly, that is, in the beginning, causally; sometimes adjoiningly, that is, in the middle, illatively.

Conditionals: as, if, if that, but if, unlest, else, or else, so that, indifferently used, except else, or else, used also disjunctively.

Exceptives: as, except, excepting, but, save, saving, beside, all these have sometimes that annexed to them and used indifferently, as, except that I see it, I will not speak it; also I would say it but that I saw it.

Interrogatives and dubitatives: as, whether, whether or no, sometimes separated as, I know not whether ye will have it or no, {n. p.} sometimes, or not. These having always a distinctive adjoining them, and sometimes with no, or not: as afore-showed.

Adversatives: as, though, although, howbeit, albeit, notwithstanding, all these having sometimes that annexed, and sometimes yet or other adversatives adjoined.

Redditives to the same: as, yet, for all that, nevertheless, and yet, yet for all that, yet nevertheless, yet notwithstanding, yet, being commonest redditive, either singly or in composition, seldom pre-joining, but ad-joining.

Electives: as, than, as, doubled, as is showed in an adverb, or else, sometimes used diminutively. And either used with a distinctive, as both is used before a copulative. And, at least, at the least, commonly pre-joined before if or ad-joined after adversative.

A verb attending on a conjunction must of necessity have another verb before or after it in the same sentence or clause of sentence.

Conjunctions, copulatives, disjunctives, electives, and some exceptives, and adverbs of likeness used conjunctively, or ad-joined commonly between words, sentences, and clauses, and govern like mood, tense, and case, except {n. p.} the later tense have an expressed sign, or other speech contrary to the former tense: as, I read and write every day, but play not, nor sleep without leave; also, I have found a top, a book, few arrows, and a purse full of counters, but thou shalt not have them. This last but is a discretive. Both used foremost, and too used hindmost copulatively, may be taken for adverbs of gathering together, as either so disjunctively used, may be said an adverb of choosing.

A Preposition is a part of speech properly used prepositively, that is, governing an accusative case set next after it (except sometimes in verse it is set after his casual word) as, I go to the church; and is some time post-positively used, that is, when it governeth the relative that or which coming before a verb, whose governing preposition is set after such verb: as, this is the man whom we speak of, or of whom we speak, and is some time used in composition after a verb but, being severed from the verb by the adverb not or by an accusative case, may be said to be set in apposition adverbially, and then having this note before it, as other adverbs so severed; but being used so in post-position, and severed as {n. p.} before-said, may have this note [, and said to be set in post-position severed: as, bring in the man’s mail, or bring the man’s mail in, for it is the mail which I brought the money [ in. So that a preposition may be said to be set sometimes prepositively, sometimes post-positively, sometimes compositively, sometimes appositively, and sometimes post-positively severed. Which first post-position is some time used in composition with the verb, and then the relative governed of the verb. For verbs compounded in English govern no other case than other single verbs, that is, an accusative case.

A Preposition is of divers voices, as followeth next, always governing an accusative case, otherwise it is an adverb, as is before-said in an adverb.

Up, down, to, into, unto, up to, down to, at, before, against, with, without, within, about, along, abroad, all abroad, toward, of, out of, in, because of, beneath, or below, after, nigh, nigh to, nigh unto, or near, behind, between, among, over, under, on or upon, beside, by, through or thorough, throughout, for, amidst, beyond, about, until, under, fro, or from, and sometimes two are compounded, as, from out, from among, from amidst, from about, from under, from upon, from before, {n. p.} from beyond, over against, etc, having commonly in such composition a signification of both singles. But being set in composition before a verb doth some time lose his proper signification: as, to outride, signifying to ride faster; to overcome, meaning to master, to conquer, to excel; touching, concerning as touching, as concerning, as for, prepositions also.

Certain prepositions form a comparative and superlative degree, as followeth, which comparisons are nouns and adjectives some time adverbially used.

 

Of up, upper, uppermost, and upmost.

Of down, downer, downermost, and downmost.

Of in, inner, innermost, and inmost.

Of before, former, foremost.

Of beneath, nether, nethermost.

Of behind, hinder, hindermost, and hindmost.

Of beyond, yonderer, yondermost, and yondmost.

Of under, undermost.

Of near, nearer, next.

Of nigh, nigher, next.

 

Toward, is some time divided by his casual word o being changed to oo: as, we came toos {F1} London ward (or toward London) the Monday, and rode too Oxford ward (or toward Oxford) the same day. And some prepositions have ward in derivation after them: as, inward, outward, offward, and are adjectives sometimes used adverbially, and sometimes forming an adverb of quality by adding ly: as, inwardly, southwardly, though we pronounce ‘sowtherly’. South and other points of the compass forming derivative with ward are used so likewise: that is, toward the point so forming derivation. Also, we say homeward, meaning toward home.

Prepositions are sometimes compounded before a substantive also, but after an adverb: as, I will make an inset thereon to profit my offspring hereafter. And being compounded after a verb do commonly keep their proper signification, but compounded before a verb, do often yield to the verb some other signification, not proper to such preposition. But touching the significations of single prepositions and their compositions before verbs, they are to be handled at large in a Dictionary: our other compositions do commonly take signification of both things compounded, as by rule is or may be explained hereafter. {n. p.}

Now we have handled a preposition in his divisions: prepositively, post-positively, compositively, appositively, and post-positively severed, or used single adverbially. The compoundings of substantives, and the appositions used with substantives, and with verbs, shall be more plainly exampled in the placing of words in sentence called construction after the handling of an interjection, which followeth.

An interjection is a part of speech that betokeneth a sudden passion of the mind. The signification or meaning of which speech must be understanded by the gesture, countenance, or passion of the speaker, and sometimes with regard of the person spoken-to, or of the thing spoken-of, as is showed by the titles following, or such like:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some be of

sorrow: as, alas, how

fear: as, oh, O Lord

wonder: as, wow, good Lord

disdain: as, waw

shunning: as, hence, away, fie

praising: as, oh, excellent

scorning: as, O brave

lamenting: as, oh, ho, ho {F2}

crying-out: as, O good Lord

cursing: as, wo wo, what a mischief

laughing: as, ah, hah, ha

calling: as, how, whoop, how sirra

silence: as, peace, hush, tst

threatening: as, well well, go to go to

stopping: as, ho, p’htrowh

forcing: as, gep, on, hop, hey, ay-horsens

fraying: as, huh, showh

 

 

And so of all other voices unperfectly uttered, yet signifying some sudden passion of the mind, in what manner soever the same be uttered: as, O abominable act, away with him, mixed in sentence thus:

 

Fie, fie for shame, what world is this?

Good Lord, what shall we say?

Wo, wo, to them: alas the while

alas and well away.

 

Soever, having no signification of itself, but by composition after another word, signifieth infinitely, and as it were without exception, and is sometimes severed from his composition thus: whosoever say nay, and whatsoever matter it be, and howsoever it be done cunningly, I will accomplish whatsoever commandment {n. p.} ye will give me. Or, what man soever say nay, and what matter soever it be, and how cunningly soever it be done, I will accomplish what commandment soever ye will give me.

Un, dis, and mis are set in composition before words, un and dis giving a signification contrary to the single word, that is, negatively, or contrary to the single, but mis granting the signification of the single, but yet in other manner that is signified in the single, and otherwise than it ought to be: as, unhonest, dishonest, unbridle, and unarm, distrust, disallow, mistrust, misallow, mistake, mischance, misbelief. And ab- as, abvice, abuse. Very and even signify always affirmatively as it were with earnestness, mostly in composition: as, very good, very well, a very varlet, even now.

 

A brief recapitulation or rehearsal of the former treatise, touching the etymology construction for English speech.

 

As English hath few and short rules for {n. p.} joining words in sentence or in construction, being greatly aided in both these points, in that the verb hath commonly his nominative case expressed, likewise the adjective his substantive, and the relative cannot be without an antecedent; and when divers substantives or clauses go before the relative, whereby the antecedent might be doubtful, we use commonly to express the right antecedent again with the relative. Our prepositions and compositions being plentifully used do aid us much also, both for the tense of the verb, and case of the substantive, who, not being nominative case to a verb, vocative, proprietary, nor gainor, nor used absolutely (as is before plainly showed in the title of cases), mostly attendeth on his governor going next before it in plain construction without verse, and answereth to the question, whom? or what? made with and after such governor called his appendant.

The speech being also as greatly aided (for the distinction of voice, and perfect signification or meaning of words) by the divers divisions or parts in the voice, for which we have now seven and thirty divers and distinct letters, and seven diphthong.: As the Latin and some other languages (being driven thereunto through lack of so many divisions in {n. p.} voice as English hath) are aided by their divers and many syllables in most words, our English words (not being formatives) are commonly but of one syllable, yet capable of anything that any other language may bear or utter. Which concludeth that our speech is far shorter than other of many syllables, we uttering sometimes five or six words with five or six syllables, when others are driven to divers syllables, in almost every word except a few prepositions, yea in some of those five or six words to use five or six syllables, and sometimes more in someone word, yet our language as sensible as theirs, and sooner conceived in sense to the ear by the reasons aforesaid, though (hitherto) utterly defaced of the credit due unto it, for lack of true orthography and grammar, now performed to the great credit and perpetual stay of the best vice of the same speech forever, a perfect dictionary being made a reward hereunto.

And as declinings of words, and the most rules for construction are handled together before, so here follow next the same rules for construction with the rest used in our English phrases, and that in verse, both for brevity and the delightable ease of the memory, as followeth; after which ensueth a brief conference of the Latin case expressed {n. p.} by our English preposition, which is a great ease to our nation what will learn Latin construction, and a like ease to the learned stranger to attain speedily unto English.

 

Brief notes in verse for parsing English in many points agreeing with Latin as followeth:

 

First mark the parts of speech of words

in every sentence,

Noting signs and equivocals

to understand their sense.

Then note each verb’s nominative,

set most before the verb,

except the verb ask question,

or be the biding mood,

or, had resolved into plain phrase,

conjunction if may get.

For then the case nominative

before the verb is set,

as is when it or there do come

before the verb right fit.

Sometimes a verb’s infinitive,

some sentence or some clause

is to the verb nominative,

and third person doth cause. {n. p.}

Let adjectives have substantives,

let antecedents be

found out for every relative;

let such to rules agree,

for verbs number and person must

agree unto his case,

as relative, in gender too,

useth antecedent’s grace.

Adjective case, gender, number,

must his substantive please,

and oft is used substantive-like,

adverbs of it find ease.

Many cases nominative,

many substantives seen,

or antecedents singular,

with conjunction between

coupling such, cause their ruled word

always plural to be,

who in person and gender must

with most worthy agree.

Where first person is worthiest,

the second is the next.

The masculine, then feminine

gender looketh too be best.

Save in such things as have no life,

the neuter taketh away all strife.

This last (for person and gender) {G1}

serveth Latin rule more rife.

Other cases follow their rule,

except they attend on

another word, and answer to

whom? or what? made upon

the next word before appendant,

on whom such case is attendant.

Saving always who, which, or that,

when they relatives be,

as ushers go before their lord,

and ruled diversely

according to the rules for case

made for words attendant,

but preposition and gerunds

seldom ushership do grant.

When nominative strange cometh

‘twixt relative and verb,

the relative must be such case

as the verb will afford:

If nominative be not there,

the relative his stead doth bear.

Propriety of relative

proprietary must

follow the rules of relative,

for case, if all be just,

so must relatives substantive

with relative expressed. {n. p.}

The relative sometimes is ruled

by preposition

in figure set after a verb,

either in composition,

or severed hath this note [ to show

it set in post-position.

That may be named equivocal,

oft a demonstrative:

sometimes conjunction causal,

sometimes a relative

changed for which: that conjunction

is oft left out in the sentence,

leaving the verb alone.

The substantive of partitive,

used with of or among,

is understanded by the word attending of along:

interrogative and numerative

do follow the like song.

Verb substantive craveth after it

such case as doth before it goes,

Yet though a passive participle

verb substantive do then follow.

So coupling and dis-joining words,

electives and exceptives too,

adverbs of likeness also, but

couple like case, and most times to {G2}

join moods and tenses like also.

Verbs of asking and teaching will

rule accusative cases too,

the one sufferer, the other thing,

our speech doth so allow.

The ending ing for participle,

or used gerundially,

doth govern like case as their verb

that doth their sense supply.

Voice active into passive voice

may be resolved, and so

voice passive into active voice

may be resolved too.

The sufferer, now nominative,

at first followed the verb,

whose ruling case was the doer,

but now the passive word

craveth of or by before the same,

each language so afford.

A participle resolved may be

unto the verb, likewise

Our speech alloweth best in phrase

that yieldeth the best guise.

The substance and the quality

of thing is first in phrase,

when of is left out in our speech,

and the thing last in place, {n. p.}

both set in composition now,

but yet resolved by for

and quality some time by with,

when compounds yet abhor.

Part, parcel, or pertaining to

crave the thing joined before,

substance is known by adjective,

derived from substantives store.

As, for example, here I show

how ye may such compoundings know.

On an earth-bank near meadow-ground,

I saw a horse-comb lie,

which I brought into a horse-mill,

that a stone-wall stood nigh,

and, finding there an elmen plank,

I sought for a wood-beetle

and wooden wedges, but found naught,

saving a latten-kettle.

 

On a bank of earth or earthen bank, near ground for meadow, I saw a comb for a horse lie, which I brought into a mill with horse, that stood nigh a stonen wall, or wall of stone, and finding there an elm-plank, or plank of elm, I sought for a beetle for wood, and wedges of wood, but found nothing, saving a kettle of latten.

There is also in our speech an apposition, a term appliable when divers verbs of one mood, {n. p.} tense, number, and person, or divers substantives of one case, or other words of one self part of speech follow one another in sentence without a copulative or disjunctive, such substantives belonging sometimes to one self thing but, having copulative or disjunctive before the latter, may pertain to divers things, and such words may be said to stand in apposition, because they are all under one rule. Also, divers substantives may be in a sentence together, not governing nor governed until all be expressed, some being set in apposition, some in composition, some with preposition, the last governed sometimes is proprietary, as in this example:

The right honourable the Lord Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, Baron of Denbigh, Knight of the most honourable Order of the Garter and of S. Michael, Master of her Majesty horses, one of her Highness most honourable Privy Council, Chancellor of the University of Oxford, and Lieutenant General of all the English garrisons in Flanders, soldier’s courage, wisdom, aptness, and strength are employed, bestowed and used valiantly, wisely, comely, and strongly, to uphold, maintain, and defend the honour, dignity, estate, commodity, and profit of {n. p.} themselves, their country, and posterity. With pardon craved, I have cred in misplacing or mistaking any word used here, only for example as aforesaid.

And herein note that to express any proprietary or appertinent by the possessive his seemeth to me very unfit: for then lawyers in feoffments, habendums, warranties, and other clauses for grants, might argue strongly that such word pertained not to the feoffer, warranter, or other granter, but to the heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns of such fief, warrant, or grant. And so generally of other proprietaries, now being figured plainly with the declinative note (his being used according to his proper vice) ye the proprietary voice and figure is used sometimes also appendantly before the proprietary attendant appertainingly: as, the wall’s breadth and my stave’s length be alone.

 

 

Adverbs of place compounded with

any preposition,

ye may resolve by this, that, which,

or what, now set alone

after place, time, manner, cause, thing,

clause, or sentence first meant.

H craving this, th craving that, {n. p.}

wh which or what hath sent.

An answer must agree in case,

and tense with question,

except the case and tense be such

that rules given plain exception.

As touching an unperfect voice,

each language hath his phrase:

by countenance and gesture such

his meaning always has.

 

Prosody

 

As prosody, for vowels’ time,

by figure is made plain:

so voice in verse soundeth short vowels

diphthong-like, being twain.

And as for English versifying,

our meter and our rhyme

will set forth anyone device

with matter, tune, and time.

Sufficient for mirth or woe,

for earnest, or game slight,

for grave or wanton, high or base,

for terror or delight.

According to each mind’s conceit,

English can keep due place,

and should be wronged if you it tie {n. p.}

unto a strange tongue’s grace.

Therefore, I leave prosody to

authors, and cause to come

and never tie that to straight rules,

which can serve every turn,

but that account useth protesis,

or count apheresis,

as doth array or ‘ray the like,

raiment of the last is,

and ‘twixt for betwixt we allow,

and low the like of this.

So half vowel in formative

in middle may increase

a syllable as e sometimes

may decrease in that place.

And s for eth may changed be

too yield some verse his grace truly.

 

A short conference of English prepositions not used in Latin for one meaning

 

Take head of of for genitive,

except it follow voice passive,

or mean as fro for ablative.

Where preposition Latin is rife

or passive maketh doer dative: {G 1}

Instead of that same genitive,

need ruleth only an ablative:

as worthy, and his counter-adjective.

Praise or dispraise and measure will

make choice of these two cases still,

plenteous, void, full, and empty,

to accuse, condemn, warn, purge, or try,

of crime, cause, thing, or like mean nigh.

Heed, to or for gainers likewise

and when likeness and profit rise,

which cause dative in Latin guise.

But for with price is ablative,

whose lone adjective is genitive.

For showing cause craveth ablative.

Mark with, before instrument and

manner of doing, ablative,

the last hath through or by, as oft,

when cause is showed, for is more rife,

so with after endowed content.

And by, whom comparative hath sent,

or than English in Latin meant.

Ing participle compounded with by

through, with, or in, gerundially,

maketh gerund do Latin supply.

Prepositions English rule place,

lo English prepositions grace,

which in Latin govern no case. {n. p.}

In showing place with at or in,

use genitive in the Latin,

as to craveth accusative,

from, by, or through crave ablative.

Latin useth prepositions too

in other phrases from these wide,

as in their ruling ye may know,

often understood they cases guide.

Some verbs rule cases two or three,

then sufferer one most times will be

most used in accusative

divers rules, divers cases give.

Impersonals lack nominative,

in Latin governing dative,

some govern an accusative,

(besides sometimes a genitive),

those English be nominative,

or else clause, or infinitive

doth itself ruler to such give.

Take heed of the English last mood,

and participle ending with ing,

Latin gerunds oft make these good,

supines rarer for these they bring.

Most Latin verbs being compounded

with preposition before them

are Englished as single verbs,

whose ruled case taketh unto him {n. p.}

the preposition; if not, set

such composition last most fit.

Where compounded phrases disagree,

good authors search and shun not me.

Equivocy doth each speech please,

resolve each phrase that sense may ease,

I know not shorter rules than these:

save the concords and rules before,

agree much with the Latin store.

Some faults may be in this impression: the composer being so much accustomed in the former vice, and the author so perfect in the sentence, that another acquainted with this vice may sooner find some faults.

 

Qd. W. Bullokar

 

Finis

{n. p.}

 

William Bullokar’s Pamphlet

for Grammar

 

Or rather to be said his Abbreviation of his Grammar for English, extracted out of his Grammar at Large. This being sufficient for the speedy learning how to parse English speech for the perfect writing thereof, and using of the best phrases therein, and the easier entrance into the secrets of grammar for other languages, and the speedier understanding of other languages ruled or not ruled by grammar. Very-profitable for the English nation that desireth to learn any strange language, and very aidful to the stranger to learn English perfectly and speedily: for that English hath short rule (thereof soon learned), yet having sufficient rules therein to make the way much

easier for the learning of any other language unknown before to the learner. He hath also caused to be imprinted with true orthography and grammar notes other books sufficient for the exercise and vice of this grammar.

 

 

Give God the praise that teacheth always. When truth trieth, error flieth.

 

 

Imprinted at London by Edmund Bollifant, 1586.{n. p.}

 

There be in English speech seven and thirty distinct single divisions of the voice, and seven mixed divisions called diphthongs. So there are in the whole four and forty distinct or several divisions in the voice of that language, which are figured or marked by letters, as followeth:

 

a, b, c’, c, ch, d, e, e’, f, g’, g, h, i, l, ľ, m, ḿ, n, ń, o, oo, p, q, r, s, sh, t, th, th̹, v, , v’, w, wh, x, ŋ, Ʒ s

To these are added k of the vice of c, also ph of the vice of f, and r by itself, and also & by itself for the word and.

Their capitals and other pairs follow, whereof some be the more in number for the easier using of former impressions, and help in equivocy. But first I will divide the vowels and half-vowels from the consonants, with their time; and then partly how these vowels and half-vowels may be used together in diphthong, as three of them so sounded together make a triphthong, in which triphthong there is always one half-vowel if there be not two.

Eight vowels: a, e, e’, i, o, oo, v,

Vowels of short time: a, e, i, o, who, having long time, are accented thus: á, é, o𝔯 æ, called a diphthong; ý, ó, and for long, we use the diphthong ou̹. {n. p.}

Vowels of long time: e, oo, v, wherein note that e’, æ’, and oo are never sounded short except when a consonant following is doubled in formative, sounding e’, or æ’, and sounding oo, as oo or o to keep formatives perfect in figure, though changed in voice. And when u is sounded short, to accent it thus ù. Easily perceived by reading authors so imprinted: yourown voice guiding you therein.

Half-vowels: ľ, ḿ, ń, ŕ, used also like the consonants l, m, n, r in formatives, when a consonant goeth next before any of them, and a vowel added after them ending the former: for in words not formed of other, such half-vowel standeth last, and is spelled alone by itself, except it follows a vowel to make a diphthong.

The seven diphthongs: aí, a, eí, eu̹, oí, ow, wí, for we use w in diphthong both for his near naming like a vowel, and because of his old vice.

Triphthongs: an elm-tree, a calm wind, a holm -wand, or holmen wand.

 

A a, B b, C’ c’, C c, Ch ch, D d, E e æ, E’ e’ æ’, F f, G’ g’, I i̹, G g, H h, I i y, K k, L l, ľ ľ, M m ḿ, N n ń, O o oo, P p, Ph ph f, Q q, R r, ŕ, S ſ s ζ, Sh ſh, T t, Th th, T̜h t̹h t̜h, U v u, u̹ u̹ v̹, ᴏ̹ ᴏ̹o ᴏ̹ᴏ̹, V’ v’ u’, W w, Wh wh, X x, Y 𝔶, Z Ʒ, & by itself. {n. p.}

 

 

Glosses

  Mirror is a spectacle mean.  

Glosses

  Nature delighteth in her like.  

Glosses

  Women chiefly in children, men should in virtue.  

Glosses

  Hope helpeth, but healeth not.  

Glosses

Prattlers and wantons are unexpert

Glosses

  Experience hath judgement.  

Glosses

  The mirrors use.

Glosses

  Each one deserves his hire.  

Glosses

  Man is friend and enemy to man.  

Glosses

  All have not like gift.  

Editorial notes

  God guideth good will.  

Editorial notes

  Bettering is no battering.  

Editorial notes

  The mirrors force.  

Glosses

  Ten-year study and charge.

Glosses

  The desolate never distitute whole nor et contra.

Glosses

  Scorning is a scourging.

Glosses

  Ungratefulness is grievous.  

Editorial notes

  Soldier under Sir Richard Wingfield in Queen Mary’s time.  

Glosses

Under Sir Edward Poinings at Newhaven.

Glosses

  Man is friend and enemy to man.  

Glosses

  God guideth good will.  

Glosses

  Ungratefulness is grievous.  

Glosses

Under Captain Turner in garrison.

Glosses

  A student in martial affairs.  

Glosses

  Store is no sore.  

Glosses

  Hawkes and hounds a delight in leisure.  

Glosses

  In husbandry not unskillful.  

Glosses

  A student in law.  

Glosses

  Years, study and experience.  

Glosses

  The end of his travel now.  

Glosses

  This volume a petty one in respect, &c.  

Glosses

  The princess stroke is of most force.  

Glosses

  Set down who & how.  

Glosses

  A credit for English.  

Glosses

  Craving conference and pardon.  

Glosses

  Extreme pains bring forgetfulness.  

Glosses

  The mirror’s end.  

Glosses

  Error in man without shame, brute as a beast deserves blame.  

Glosses

  Extremity tries courage.

Glosses

  Conference, yea with any.

Glosses

  Injuries cause war: peace prefer.  

Glosses

  Conclusion with good will, to further good still.  

Glosses

  Speech is divided into eight parts.  

Glosses

  Speech is divided into eight parts.  

Glosses

  The name of a thing that may be seen, felt, heard, or understanded is a noun, and easily perceived by a, an, or the set before it.  

Glosses

  A noun-substantive is a perfect word by itself.  

Glosses

  A noun-adjective is not understanded by itself, without a substantive joined unto it: which substantive will answer to the question, who? or what?  

Glosses

  The singular number speaketh but of one, the plural of more than one.  

Glosses

A, an used appellatively in the singular number only except &c.

Glosses

  The being used demonstratively or relatively in both numbers.  

Glosses

  A substantive is declined with five cases in both numbers.  

Glosses

  The simple word is the nominative case set before a verb, whom it governs in number and person. But asking, commanding it or there demonstratively used, and had, having if understanded, cause the nominative to come after his verb.

Glosses

  The accusative case follows a verb, participle, preposition, or gerundial.  

Glosses

  The gainative case shows the gainor, or his contrary; resolvable by to or for.  

Glosses

  The vocative is called or spoken to.

Glosses

  The fewer cases above be all of one voice and figure.  

Glosses

  The genitive proprietary ends in es, s, or z added to the nominative, resolvable by of, his propriety now first in phrase, rather is than es for distinctions sake.  

Glosses

  There is a nominative [p. 6] absolute and an accusative absolute when there is no word whereof they may be governed.  

Glosses

  No ablative case in English.  

Glosses

  The nominative, accusative, gainative, and vocative be of one figure and voice. The genitive has the addition of es, s, or z, and most times equivocates with the nominative plural figured by addition with es, s, or z.  

Glosses

  By z, es, or s the plural do ges: the genitives us, z, es, or s, but for distinctions sake it were better is.  

Glosses

  The genitive plural in voice should take es, added to his former voice in es, s, or zboth these being commonly equivocated with the genitive singular: in all which e may be taken [p. 8] away by the figure syncope to defalk a syllable in verse, or, where the former doth end in s, or in z, plural f is changed into vs. Some plurals are formed by adding ii: and some are changed in voice and figure, and some have one voice and figure in both numbers, forming their genitives according to the nominative ending letter: to wit, c’, ch, g’, x, z, s, or sh add es. To l, m, n, r, vowel, half vowel, or diphthong add z. To all other add s.

Glosses

  He, she, it used demonstratively or relatively to distinguish a thing being male or female or neither of these: it is sometime used demonstratively before male and before female, yea sometimes before these or other demonstratives being of plural number and of what person soever.  

Glosses

  It serving to doubtful gender.

Glosses

  It giving place to the nominative case set after the verb.  

Glosses

  An adjective or participle may be said to be the common gender.  

Glosses

  He, she, it and who, which, that: relatives declined.  

Glosses

  It serving to doubtful gender.

Glosses

  It giving place to the nominative case set after the verb.  

Glosses

  An adjective or participle may be said to be the common gender.  

Glosses

  He, she, it and who, which, that: relatives declined.  

Glosses

  He, she, it and who, which, that: relatives declined.  

Glosses

  He, she, it and who, which, that: relatives declined.  

Glosses

  He, she, it and who, which, that: relatives declined.  

Glosses

  He, she, it and who, which, that: relatives declined.  

Glosses

  He, she, it and who, which, that: relatives declined.  

Glosses

  Who, which, what: interrogatives and indefinites declined.  

Glosses

  An adjective is undeclined, except it stands without a substantive [p. 13] and then declined as a substantive.  

Glosses

  Adjectives form their comparative by er, their superlative by est.  

Glosses

  Adjectives changing voice in their comparisons.  

Glosses

  Comparatives between two, superlatives between more.  

Glosses

  Comparative formed by more, the superlative by most.  

Glosses

  Comparison by better and best, worse and worst.

Glosses

  Adjectives exceeding their signification compounded with too and over.  

Glosses

  Two adjectives in composition together, and some compounded [p. 15] otherwise with syllable or word.  

Glosses

  Adjectives turned into adverbs.

Glosses

  Six figures: to wit, primitive and derivative; single and compositive; simple and declinative.  

Glosses

  Three grammar notes: derivative known by (.), compositive by (-), declinative by (‘).  

Glosses

  As derivatives, or consanguinatives.

Glosses

  A noun-declinative hath his note above, the verb hath it under the first letter of addition, but declinative changed in voice hath his note set to the first letter of such word changed.  

Glosses

  An equivocate is a word having divers meanings, yet of one part of speech, but, being of divers parts of speech, may be called an equivocal. A help to understand equivocy.

Glosses

  A noun knowen by a, an, or the.  

Glosses

  Pronouns are sixteen with their compounds.  

Glosses

  A verb is knowen by to and declined with three persons in both numbers.  

Glosses

  A participle knowen by his derivation from a verb and his own figure.  

Glosses

  An adverb is neither ruled of any word, nor ruleth any.  

Glosses

  A preposition ever ruleth an accusative case.  

Glosses

  A conjunction joineth words and sentences.  

Glosses

  An interjection is a sudden and unperfect voice sometimes of divers words.

Glosses

  Grammar notes and pairs of letters may distinguish equivocy.  

Glosses

  A dictionary and grammar may stay our speech in a perfect use forever.

Glosses

  Divers words of one meaning called co-significatives.  

Glosses

  A pronoun showeth or rehearseth, whereof there be sixteen.  

Glosses

  Self in composition showing the person, but own without self showeth the possession.

Glosses

  A Demonstrative showeth, a relative rehearseth.  

Glosses

  The declining of I, thou, he, she, it, who, which, and that.  

Glosses

  Pronouns possessives be undeclined, except the using of hers, theirs, ours, yours proprietarily.  

Glosses

  The declining of this and that. Self and same undeclined except selves plural, showing the persons.  

Glosses

  The article before, self, same, and which.  

Glosses

  The first person speaketh of himself. The second spoken unto. The third spoken of.  

Glosses

  An adjective is ruled by his substantive.  

Glosses

  A relative by his antecedent.  

Glosses

  A verb is declined with mood, tense, number, and person either active, having a participle, passive, or verb substantive, or neuter.  

Glosses

  To have, a possessive; to have rather, a choicative.

Glosses

  To have, a possessive; to have rather, a choicative.

Glosses

  Five moods.  

Glosses

  The indicative showeth or asketh.  

Glosses

  The imperative biddeth.

Glosses

  The optative wisheth.  

Glosses

  The subjunctive joineth.  

Glosses

  The iInfinitive hath neither number, person, nor nominative case, and knowen by to etc.  

Glosses

  The iInfinitive hath neither number, person, nor nominative case, and knowen by to etc.  

Glosses

  That understanded and some time resolving the infinitive mood.  

Glosses

  Three times: now, past, to come.  

Glosses

  Time past divided into preter, preter-perfect, preter-plu-perfect.  

Glosses

  All preters are commonly of one voice: a doubtful-preter, and doubtful-future.  

Glosses

  Three conjugations or declinings and but one of them in chief use.

Glosses

  Est and eth formative endings of the present tense, eth sometime changed into s.

Glosses

  Edst or est formative endings of the preter.  

Glosses

  The present tense is some time the doubtful future.  

Glosses

  Imparative use of second person: let, imparatively governing the first and third person.  

Glosses

  Imparative use of second person: let, imparatively governing the first and third person.  

Glosses

  Imparative use of second person: let, imparatively governing the first and third person.  

Glosses

  Imparative use of second person: let, imparatively governing the first and third person.  

Glosses

  I-pray God, pray-God, & God-grant used with the present, preter, preter-perfect, and future tense.  

Glosses

I would, would, would-God, would to God, O that, O if used with the preter-plu-perfect, doubtful preter and doubtful future.

Glosses

  An optative without adverb.  

Glosses

  Some conjunctions follow the indicative endings, some the optative.  

Glosses

When asking is a mere adverb, otherwise a conjunction.

Editorial notes

  Conditionals, exceptives, and adversatives require the voice in the [p. 29] optative, these being in the place of the optative adverbs.  

Glosses

  The infinitive with his to, signes, and endings, in his preters.

Glosses

  The verb substantive declined.  

Glosses

  Neuters unperfect undeclined, except est added in the second person singular.

Glosses

Equivocy in will, wilt, and would.

Glosses

  Some change voice in all preters, some in the preter of the indicative only.  

Glosses

  Compounded verbs declined everywhere as their single, as have rather a choicative.

Glosses

  Have and had equivocals, note their significations.  

Glosses

  Signs of tenses and verbs neuters unperfect are sometimes used without expressing their significative verb.  

Glosses

  Preters formed by ed added to the simple, t for d syncoped after c, ch, f, k, s, p, ph, x, t, or sh.

Glosses

  Methink and methought impersonals.  

Glosses

Let imperatively or permissively used

Glosses

  Impersonals seeming yet none.

Glosses

  A participle derived of a verb, [p. 37] ing added to the simple formeth the participle of the present tense.  

Glosses

  Gerundial in ing.

Glosses

  Verbals in ing, or, and er.

Glosses

  Verbals in ing, or, and er.

Glosses

  Participle preter endeth always in ed, d, t, n, or ń, used passively or with being, but actively compounded with having.  

Glosses

  And, being equivocal with the verb of present tense, distinguished thus: I put; preter, I putt; participle, putt. Consonant doubled for equivocy, and time of vowels.  

Glosses

  Participles resolvable by their verb, and the passive into an active verb, and e contra.

Glosses

  Participles forming comparisons.  

Glosses

  An adverb is joined to a verb or participle, and some to an adjective or other adverb, governed of no word, yet his dependent answering to the question, what?

Glosses

  Preposition without case is an adverb.  

Glosses

  Not is set after a verb, but before a participle: other negatives and the rest (except asking and wishing placed before the verb and his nominative case) are used now here, now there.  

Glosses

  Qualitives end in ly, wise, or are adjectives compounded with a, or used adverbially: all generally answering to how?

Glosses

  As quantitatives answer to how much?  

Glosses

  One adverb may have divers significations.  

Glosses

  Adverbs forming comparison.  

Glosses

  The before adverbs of comparative or superlative degree.

Glosses

  As repeated. As alone conjunctively. As after so and such.  

Glosses

  So as, conjunction, for so that.  

Glosses

  Adverbs of place beginning with h, th, wh compounded are resolved by this, that, which, or what.

Glosses

  One voice sometimes an adverb, sometimes a conjunction, sometimes a preposition, and knowen asunder by uses.  

Glosses

  Some languages differ in using some other parts of speech for one meaning.

Glosses

  A conjunction joineth.  

Glosses

Copulatives, disjunctives, electives, exceptives, and adverbs of likeness, couple like mood, tense, and case, except, etc.  

Glosses

  Prepositively before an accusative case set after the verb.  

Glosses

  Postpositively ruling that or which, going before.  

Glosses

Compositively with this (-). Appositively and adverbially with this () as other adverbs so severed. Post positively severed with this ([).

Glosses

  A verb compounded governeth case as single verb.  

Glosses

  Preposition adverbially single.

Glosses

  Their proper significations shall be exampled hereafter, if God lend life and leisure.  

Glosses

  Comparisons from prepositions are adjectives or adverbials.  

Glosses

  Their proper significations shall be exampled hereafter, if God lend life and leisure.  

Glosses

  Comparisons from prepositions are adjectives or adverbials.  

Glosses

  Toward divided by his ruled case, o turned into oo.  

Glosses

  Ward used to form derivative.  

Glosses

  Preposition compounded before a substantive, and after an adverb. And after a verb keepeth his signification, but before a verb some alter the signification of both.  

Glosses

  Compositions and appositions of substantives together ruled after.  

Glosses

  An interjection is a sudden and unperfect speech.  

Glosses

  Sentence interjectively used.  

Glosses

  Soever infinitely some time severed from his composition.

Glosses

  Un, dis, mis, ab, very, and even explained for signification.  

Glosses

  English hath short rules.  

Glosses

  The three concords are easy, because the governor is mostly expressed.  

Glosses

  Prepositions and composition explaining English.  

Glosses

  The governor knowen by who, which, or what? made before the verb, but made after adjective or relative, and after an appendant to find the governed case.  

Glosses

  English significations expressed by divisions in voice and Latin by divers syllables.

Glosses

  Therefore, English may express by one syllable that for which other use divers syllables; and English the briefer, yet as sensible.

Glosses

  Defaced for lack of true orthography and grammar.  

Glosses

  Rules for construction in verse for memory’s sake.  

Glosses

  A conference with Latin followeth.

Glosses

  Mark the parts of speech, specially signs and equivocy.  

Glosses

  Mark the parts of speech, specially signs and equivocy.  

Glosses

  Note the verb and his nominative.  

Glosses

  Asking, bidding, or had set their nominative after them.

Glosses

  Likewise, it and there.

Glosses

  Infinitive, sentence, or clause is instead of a nominative.

Glosses

  Adjective hath substantive, or used substantive-like or adverbially.  

Glosses

  Relative hath an antecedent. How these do concord or agree.  

Glosses

  Many nominatives, substantives, or antecedents.  

Glosses

  Verb, adjective, and relative plural. Then first person, ect. masculine gender, etc. worthiest, except in things without life as this serveth the Latin most.

Glosses

  The case of the substantive.  

Glosses

  The case of the relatives, who, which, or that, being as gentlemen ushers.  

Glosses

  Preposition and gerunds seldom grant ushership.  

Glosses

  The relative nominative case to the verb.  

Glosses

  Propriety ruled as his relative proprietary: likewise, his substantive being expressed.  

Glosses

  The relative ruled by preposition, by composition, or post-position.  

Glosses

  That demonstrative, relative, and conjunction sometimes understood.  

Glosses

  The substantive of partitive, interrogative, and numerative understood.  

Glosses

  Words coupling like cases.  

Glosses

  Ye like moods and tenses also.

Glosses

  Verbs governing a double accusative.  

Glosses

  Participle, and gerundial governing as their verb.  

Glosses

  Resolving of active into passive and e contra

Glosses

  Participle resolved by his verb and e contra.  

Glosses

  Compounding of substantives showing substance, quality, use, part, or pertaining to.  

Glosses

  Examples for substantives compounded.  

Glosses

  Compositions and substantiative adjective resolved by prepositions of, for, or with.  

Glosses

  Apposition is when divers words [p. 62] of one part of speech come together under one rule: yea sometimes sixt seen with preposition, composition, conjunction, and proprietarily.  

Editorial notes

  Examples for apposition intermingled with preposition, composition, conjunction, and proprietaries.  

Glosses

  His refused for expressed proprietaryship.  

Glosses

  H, th, wh beginning adverbs of place, resolvable by, this, that, which, or what.  

Glosses

  An answer is ruled by the question.  

Glosses

  Interjective phrases.  

Glosses

  Time of vowels by figure. Two short vowels sounded as one. Every language hath natural to be forest.  

Glosses

  Authors and present cause five rule for prosody and versifying.  

Glosses

Prothesis and appheresis in English words.

Glosses

  Half-vowels increasing or decreasing a syllable in the middle.  

Glosses

  S changed for eth at the end.

Glosses

  Of showing Latin genitive, except.  

Glosses

  Of showing dative doer.  

Glosses

  Of showing ablative.  

Glosses

  Of choosing genitive or ablative.  

Glosses

  To or for showing dative.  

Glosses

  For in ablative (with price), some in genitive.  

Glosses

  With, thorough, for, by, than show ablative.

Glosses

  By, with, thorough, in compounded gerundially.  

Glosses

  Place ruled in either language.  

Glosses

  Latin prepositions in other phrases and sometimes understood.  

Glosses

  Divers rules have divers cases from one verb.  

Glosses

  Latin impersonals, but English personals.  

Glosses

  Infinitive and participle in ing show Latin gerunds and supines.  

Glosses

  Latin verbs compounded, Englished as single.  

Glosses

  Read authors for perfectness.  

Glosses

  By resolving phrases, the best is found.

Glosses

  Referred to the verses before.  

Glosses

  The thirty-seven single letters.

Glosses

  Vowels time.  

Glosses

  Fewer half vowels

Glosses

  The single letters with their capitals and other pairs between the double prik.  

Glosses

  The single letters with their capitals and other pairs between the double prik.  

Editorial notes

A pregnancy lasts 10 lunar months.

Editorial notes

Bullokar probably refers to his Book at large (1580).

Editorial notes

William Bullokar, Booke at Large, 1580.

Editorial notes

The category “adjective” is not listed among the undeclined word classes, but is discussed later in the text under the heading “noun-adjective”. Since  early Greek grammars, adjectives were considered as a subclass of nouns (Robins, A Short History of Linguistics, 1997: 35; Trask, R.L., A Dictionary of Grammatical terms in Linguistics, 2013: 188).  

Editorial notes

The labels “noun-substantive” and “noun-adjective” are calques from post-classical Latin nomen substantivum and nomen adjectivum, the two subclasses of nouns (OED, www.oed.com/view/Entry/256929. Accessed 6 November 2022; www.oed.com/view/Entry/256444. Accessed 6 November 2022)

Editorial notes

The labels “noun-substantive” and “noun-adjective” are calques from post-classical Latin nomen substantivum and nomen adjectivum, the two subclasses of nouns (OED, www.oed.com/view/Entry/256929. Accessed 6 November 2022; www.oed.com/view/Entry/256444. Accessed 6 November 2022)

Editorial notes

See above.

Editorial notes

In contemporary grammars, Bullokar’s “gainative” corresponds to the syntactic function of “indirect object”, which appears in ditransitive constructions. Bullokar conflates in the case “gainative” the two semantic roles of “Recipient” and “Benefactive”, as evidenced by the examples provided. See the Introduction for further discussion.  

Editorial notes

Bullokar uses a masculine possessive determiner to refer to lexical categories, thus assigning a masculine gender to the items “verb” and “noun”. 

Editorial notes

Bullolar refers here to the -ing form of verbs, and distinguishes between participle and gerundial. In contemporary learner’s grammars, the two categories tend to be conflated. Some linguists however distinguish between the two. See the introduction for further discussion.  

Editorial notes

In English grammar, the nominative absolute case typically consists of a noun followed by a predicate containing an indefinite verb. It parallels Latin ablative absolute (Woodcock 1959: 73-4). 

Editorial notes

The endings of the declension system have been modernised to  contemporary spelling.

Editorial notes

The indication of the plural of “roof” as “roofs” is a blatant violation of the rule exposed earlier by Bullokar: “Change -f always into -vz”. As a matter of fact, the OED reports that “the historic plural form with a voiced consonant /v/ is superseded in the early 17th cent. in standard usage by the analogical form with f (already attested, at least as a spelling, in the 15th cent.)” (OED, www.oed.com/view/Entry/167250. Accessed 6 November 2022.). In Contemporary English, the form rooves appears in the 19th century, it remains unusual and is currently labeled as non-standard or regional. 

Editorial notes

The symbol <è> is used by Bullokar in genitive endings of plural nouns whose final consonant is a fricative, to signal the epenthetic short vowel /ɪ/. 
In contemporary English, the letter <e> is used to signal epenthetic /ɪ/ after fricative sounds in final position. It is not reported in the modernised version. 

Glosses

  It serving to doubtful gender.

Editorial notes

Bullokar uses the apostrophe to distinguish the demonstrative uses of it, as opposed to the “relative” use of the pronoun, which is discussed below. The apostrophe is not reported in the modernised version. 

Editorial notes

In this passage, Bullokar discusses some notions of English morphology. A “primitive” corresponds to the modern notion of root, a “derivative” is any derived lexical item, either through inflection (e.g., hard > harder), or through derivation (e.g., lean > leanness); a “single” is a lexical item that is not part of a “compositive”, i.e., a compound; a “simple” corresponds to the citation form of nouns and verbs, which becomes the “declinative” when the part of speech is inflected.    

Editorial notes

This symbol is used by Bullokar to indicate suffixes. It is not reported in the modernised version.

Editorial notes

This symbol is not reported in the modernised version. 

Editorial notes

“A mound or other structure on which a target is placed for archery practice” ("butt, n.7." OED Online, Oxford University Press, September 2022, www.oed.com/view/Entry/25364. Accessed 7 November 2022.)

Editorial notes

“Chiefly with reference to an animal: a push or shove with the head, horns, or a specific body part” ("butt, n.3." OED Online, Oxford University Press, September 2022, www.oed.com/view/Entry/25369. Accessed 7 November 2022.)

Editorial notes

Bullokar distinguishes between two types of homophones: equivocates and equivocals. The former are words that sound the same, have different meanings, and belong to the same part of speech. The latter are words that sound the same, have different meanings, and belong to different parts of speech. Particularly, the examples provided to illustrate the class of equivocals suggest that the confusion was in their pronunciation, as Bullokar’s spelling allows to disambiguate between the different words. 
In contemporary linguistic theory, cases of two distinct words having the same spelling are classified as homonyms, disregarding their  respective parts of speech. 

Editorial notes

This symbol is not reported in the modernised version.

Editorial notes

Bullokar seems to contradict here what he stated on p. 13.

Editorial notes

The three conjugations identified by Bullokar correspond to the three kinds of verbs that he has discussed and illustrates here. The first kind of verbs are the “verbs active”, the great majority of verbs (“it [:a verb that] signifieth to do”). “Verbs neuter” also belong to this category: these are those verbs that cannot undergo passivisation, i.e., intransitive verbs. The second kind of verbs are passive forms: consequently, the second conjugation illustrates the declension of the verb to be “verb substantive”. Lastly, the “neuters unperfect” correspond to modal verbs, illustrated in the third conjugation.

Editorial notes

The adjective form lever is to be understood here as the comparative form of the adjective lief, meaning “beloved, dear, acceptable”. It could also be used adverbially, meaning “gladly, willingly”, hence its usage as an alternative to “rather”. (OED, www.oed.com/view/Entry/108057. Accessed 9 November 2022; Hall 1881). 

Editorial notes

The label “noun verbal” is a calque from post-classical Latin nomen verbale and it defines “a noun formed from an inflection of a verb and partly sharing its constructions” (OED, www.oed.com/view/Entry/222360. Accessed 9 November 2022). Bullokar expands the definition by including in the category noun verbal also deverbal nouns, i.e., nouns formed through derivation: those derived in -or “signifying the donor”, and those derived in -er, “signifying an instrument wherewith a thing is done”.

Editorial notes

This symbol is not reported in the modernised version.

Editorial notes

This symbol is not typically reported in the modernised version. It is reported however on pp. 47 and 54 because Bullokar illustrates different functions of the same symbol. 

Editorial notes

Bullokar distinguishes between the two class of conjunctions based on their position in the sentence: illatives are used “adjoiningly”; causals are used at the beginning of a sentence. If causals are used in the middle of the sentence they are used “illatively”. From a lexical point of view, the two groups are the same. 

Editorial notes

This symbol is not typically reported in the modernised version. It is reported however on pp. 40 and 54 because Bullokar illustrates different functions of the same symbol.

Editorial notes

This symbol is only reported in the example that illustrates it.

Editorial notes

This symbol is not typically reported in the modernised version. It is reported however on pp. 40 and 47 because Bullokar illustrates different functions of the same symbol. 

Editorial notes

Bullokar refers to the markedly inflectional nature of Latin as opposed to English. The “parts in the voice” are the different phonemes. According to Bullokar, English has a higher number of phonemes than Latin, because it scarcely recurs to morphological devices to create new words. Latin instead has a smaller set of phonemes, but has more “syllables”, i.e., morphemes. 

Editorial notes

Lord Robert Dudley, First Earl of Leicester (1532-1588).

Editorial notes

These symbols are not reported in the modernised version of the grammar. They are reported here (and below) because the author is listing them.

Glosses

The single letters with their capitals and other pairs between the double prick.

ToC